Editorial: In Defense of Bad Grammar
Cholo Mercado
I suppose it’s normal for anyone who loves books as much as I do to feel animosity for anything that exhibits bad grammar or, for that matter, just general unattractive misuse of the English language. I know I did. I remember getting into fights with my friends just because I pointed out their grammatical mistakes a bit too harshly. I used to do it with an intention to condescend, as if saying bad English is a symptom of a greater intellectual malaise. It felt good too. I was like a genius pointing out their excess of commas and sentence splicing, something of a redeeming factor when one considered my general mediocrity. My friends hated me for it, and, to an extent, I hated that they hated me for it—but it made me feel good, it made me feel superior; that is something we all want, and I was entertaining the delusion that I had it.
I ceased to be a child, however, and eventually—messily—I grew up. Meeting different people and going through different experiences taught me that human beings have more than just linguistic and intellectual dimensions, and these two do not even necessarily correspond to one another. I’ve met people who cannot speak proper English admittedly, but know a vast number of things to make up for it. I’ve had brilliant professors in college who stumble in their grammar so much that I can count the errors—and a couple who stumbled so much more that I would frequently lose track. I’ve met people who can write poetry in Filipino like you wouldn’t believe, but have trouble making their subjects and verbs agree.